Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- en:sdrx [2013/07/26 09:44] – [Radio meteor detection stations] fluktuacia
+++ en:sdrx [2013/07/26 10:13] – [An independent receiver] fluktuacia
@@ Line 333: / Line 333: @@
 ====== Ideas for improvements ======
-  * <del> To add a logarithmic scalar output indicating "the extent of saturation of the receiver". </del> The logarithmic detector for measuring of the integral output through the input band of the receiver. (Possibly can be done with RF detector [[en:rfdetect|RFdetect01A]]).
+  * <del> To add a logarithmic scalar output indicating "the extent of the receiver's saturation". </del> The logarithmic detector for measuring of the integral output through the input band of the receiver. (Possibly can be done with RF detector [[en:rfdetect|RFdetect01A]]).
-  * To add a module with a suitable ADC and so eliminate the complications with the funcioning of the suitable sound card.
+  * To add a module with a suitable ADC and so eliminate the complications with the functioning of the suitable sound card.
-  * <del> To desing module with a galvanically separated symmetrical power supply. </del> Solved by [[cs:sympower|SYMPOWER01A]]  module.
+  * <del> To design a module with a galvanically separated symmetrical power supply. </del> Solved by [[cs:sympower|SYMPOWER01A]]  module.
   * To figure out a way to compare the gain between the individual receivers. (preferably digitally)
@@ Line 343: / Line 343: @@
 Adding more modules to the arrangement could create a complete set where the receiver would be independent on a computer. Its realisation has several variants:
-  * The receiver with a tunable oscillator and module with LDC that would show the tuned frequency. The buttons below the LCD would allow the retuning of the receiving frequency.
+  * The receiver with a tunable oscillator and a module with LDC that would show the tuned frequency. The buttons below the LCD would allow the retuning of the receiving frequency.
-  * A second variant would be the same as the first one, with an exception of digitising the analog output, that would be transmitted through some kind of a common interface to a computer (USB, ThunderBolt, Ethernet, ...). The same interface could be used for LO tuning as well.
+  * A second variant would be the same as the first one, with an exception of digitizing the analog output, that would be transmitted through some kind of a common interface to a computer (USB, ThunderBolt, Ethernet, ...). The same interface could be used for LO tuning as well.