en:adcdual
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
en:adcdual [2018/12/20 13:36] – fluktuacia | en:adcdual [2018/12/28 13:28] – fluktuacia | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
* Sampling jitter < 100m | * Sampling jitter < 100m | ||
- | Currently, the problem is tackled on a professional level by proprietary digitising units (([[http:// | + | Currently, the problem is tackled on a professional level by proprietary digitising units (([[http:// |
=== Choice of ADC === | === Choice of ADC === | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
either [[http:// | either [[http:// | ||
- | As can be seen, the whole ADC series from Linear technology is more or less the same (the converters are even mutually interchangeable between the PCB), they only differ in sampling frequency and S/N ratio. The slowest one of them (je pro 20 MHz). The slowest sampling rate that it is able to carried out is 5 MSPS. All converters from this category are more or less configurable and all ADCs’ (even other than made by Linear Technology) have SPI interface for configuration. | + | As can be seen, the whole ADC series from Linear technology is more or less the same (the converters are even mutually interchangeable between the same PCB layout), they only differ in sampling frequency and S/N ratio. The slowest one of them can be used for sampling rate of 20 MHz. The slowest sampling rate that it is able to carried out is 5 MSPS. All converters from this category are more or less configurable and all ADCs’ (even others |
===== Related sites ===== | ===== Related sites ===== | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
* [[http:// | * [[http:// | ||
- | There are several problems with these devices - especially their high price, unnecessarily high sampling | + | There are several problems with these devices - especially their high price, unnecessarily high sampling |
en/adcdual.txt · Last modified: 2018/12/28 13:43 (external edit)